arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Open Shop, Closed Shop, Agency Shop, and Union Default in Comparative Perspective: Members, Resources, and Individual Autonomy

Mark Harcourt & Gregor Gall

Industrial Relations Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70031article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Strategies designed to revive the declining union movement require new resources and new members for success. For this, many unions often used closed or agency shops. We compare these with the now dominant open shop as well as the union default. These options are assessed by asking how effective would each be at securing both members and resources for unions; and how much would each option protect and/or advance worker's autonomy in terms of various individual freedoms? Though closed and agency shops have many merits, especially in relation to the open shop, we conclude that the union default is superior to both.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70031

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mark2026,
  title        = {{The Open Shop, Closed Shop, Agency Shop, and Union Default in Comparative Perspective: Members, Resources, and Individual Autonomy}},
  author       = {Mark Harcourt & Gregor Gall},
  journal      = {Industrial Relations Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70031},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Open Shop, Closed Shop, Agency Shop, and Union Default in Comparative Perspective: Members, Resources, and Individual Autonomy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.