Appreciation From a Management Perspective: Exploring the Complexity of Managers Communication Responsibility Through a Diary Study

Julia Stranzl et al.

International Journal of Business Communication2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251395682article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Perceiving appreciation at work has positive individual and organizational outcomes. Managers in particular are attributed with responsibility to communicate appreciation to employees and to support cultivating an appreciative working environment. This study aims to provide an in-depth analysis of managers’ communication responsibility based on qualitative diaries conducted in five European countries in 2025. The empirical material offers insights into structural challenges, emphasizes specific critical aspects in communicating appreciation, and explains why managers themselves often feel not appreciated at work (and lack in the appreciation of others). The present study contributes to leadership discourses by offering sensitive insights that enable a reflective debate about formally assigned and intrinsically acknowledged communication responsibility in an organizational context. The chosen design does not allow generalizability; the data is limited to the perspective of managers from big organizations (<250 employees) in Europe.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251395682

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{julia2026,
  title        = {{Appreciation From a Management Perspective: Exploring the Complexity of Managers Communication Responsibility Through a Diary Study}},
  author       = {Julia Stranzl et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Business Communication},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251395682},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Appreciation From a Management Perspective: Exploring the Complexity of Managers Communication Responsibility Through a Diary Study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.