← Back to results Feeling lonely? Preferences for support programmes to reduce loneliness among older adults in Australia: A discrete choice experiment Mesfin G. Genie et al.
Abstract Findings suggest interventions to reduce loneliness among older adults should prioritise affordable, regular, locally accessible, and community-oriented programmes, tailored specifically according to socioeconomic and mobility-related differences.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105587 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{mesfin2026,
title = {{Feeling lonely? Preferences for support programmes to reduce loneliness among older adults in Australia: A discrete choice experiment}},
author = {Mesfin G. Genie et al.},
journal = {Health Policy},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105587},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Feeling lonely? Preferences for support programmes to reduce loneliness among older adults in Australia: A discrete choice experiment
AU - al., Mesfin G. Genie et
JO - Health Policy
PY - 2026
ER - Mesfin G. Genie et al. (2026). Feeling lonely? Preferences for support programmes to reduce loneliness among older adults in Australia: A discrete choice experiment. *Health Policy*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105587 Mesfin G. Genie et al.. "Feeling lonely? Preferences for support programmes to reduce loneliness among older adults in Australia: A discrete choice experiment." *Health Policy* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105587. Feeling lonely? Preferences for support programmes to reduce loneliness among older adults in Australia: A discrete choice experiment
Mesfin G. Genie et al. · Health Policy · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105587 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.