arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Why cognition matters: perspectives in post-stroke motor rehabilitation research

Faye Tabone et al.

Disability and Rehabilitation2026https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2652832article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Motor rehabilitation risks inequity and poor real-world translation unless trials routinely include and characterise PSCI. NIHR-INCLUDE emphasises inclusion of under-served groups, supporting the need for trials and service models that adapt interventions for cognitive impairment rather than excluding affected individuals.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2652832

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{faye2026,
  title        = {{Why cognition matters: perspectives in post-stroke motor rehabilitation research}},
  author       = {Faye Tabone et al.},
  journal      = {Disability and Rehabilitation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2652832},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Why cognition matters: perspectives in post-stroke motor rehabilitation research

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.