arbiter
JournalsAccount

Artificial Intelligence–Driven Contractual Conflict Management in the AEC Industry: Mapping Benefits, Practice, Readiness, and Ethical Implementation Strategies

Muluken Shibru Zeberga et al.

Journal of Management in Engineering2025https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-6523article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.52

Abstract

Contracting parties in the architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry often miss out on the benefits of constructive contractual conflicts and instead face adverse outcomes due to destructive ones. Studies suggest that embracing artificial intelligence (AI) can improve the management of destructive contractual conflicts. However, a gap remains in capturing a holistic view of applying an AI–driven contractual conflict management (CCM) system to manage these conflicts before they escalate into claims and disputes. Thus, this study aims to fill this research gap by answering three research questions: RQ1: What are the perceived benefits of using AI in managing contractual conflicts in the AEC industry? RQ2: What is the current state of the AEC industry regarding managing contractual conflicts and implementing an AI–driven CCM system to address these conflicts? RQ3: What core elements and strategies are needed to implement an AI–driven CCM system in the AEC industry? Data collected from 32 experts through semistructured interviews revealed that AI could aid in data analysis, conflict prediction, operational efficiency, decision analysis, negotiation, and collaboration processes within the industry. Despite facing several challenges in managing contractual conflicts, the industry is at a critical stage in implementing an AI–driven CCM system. This study identified and discussed the importance of implementing a legally framed, trustful, prevention-oriented, and human-centered AI–driven system. It also discussed the associated ethical issues and proposed frameworks to ensure a lawful, trustworthy, and human-centered AI–driven CCM system. Furthermore, it proposed an iterative implementation strategy, including formulation, context adaptation, piloting, optimization, and large-scale implementation. This study outlines theoretical and practical contributions and suggests potential research areas to address the study’s limitations.

7 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-6523

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{muluken2025,
  title        = {{Artificial Intelligence–Driven Contractual Conflict Management in the AEC Industry: Mapping Benefits, Practice, Readiness, and Ethical Implementation Strategies}},
  author       = {Muluken Shibru Zeberga et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Management in Engineering},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-6523},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Artificial Intelligence–Driven Contractual Conflict Management in the AEC Industry: Mapping Benefits, Practice, Readiness, and Ethical Implementation Strategies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.52

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.47 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.68 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.