The Biophilia Reactivity Hypothesis: biophilia as a temperament trait, or more precisely, a domain specific attraction to biodiversity

Vanessa Woods & Melinda Knuth

Journal of Bioeconomics2023https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-023-09342-warticle
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.51

What the paper says

Abstract E.O. Wilson proposed the concept of biophilia as “the innately emotional affiliation of human beings with other living organisms.” While the idea has gained traction in diverse fields, including architecture and horticulture, the few empirical tests of the biophilia hypothesis are either inconclusive or fail to provide support. This paper reviews fundamental flaws in Wilson's biophilia hypothesis and proposes “the Biophilia Reactivity Hypothesis”: biophilia as a temperament trait, a theory that offers a falsifiable version of Wilson’s original concept.

11 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-023-09342-w

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{vanessa2023,
  title        = {{The Biophilia Reactivity Hypothesis: biophilia as a temperament trait, or more precisely, a domain specific attraction to biodiversity}},
  author       = {Vanessa Woods & Melinda Knuth},
  journal      = {Journal of Bioeconomics},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-023-09342-w},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Biophilia Reactivity Hypothesis: biophilia as a temperament trait, or more precisely, a domain specific attraction to biodiversity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.51

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.42 × 0.4 = 0.17
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.