arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Necropolitics, Gaza, and the limits of theory

Thom Davies et al.

Progress in Human Geography2026https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251408092article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We would like to thank Alexander A. Dunlap for his generous engagement with our article on necropolitics and geography (Peters et al 2025).His reflections on positionality and the varying intensities and scales of necropolitics resonate strongly with our own concerns.Likewise, we share his conviction that necropolitics cannot be reduced to death alone, but must be understood as part of a wider web of slow, fast, and injurious harms, intimately bound to the operations of extractive states and capitalism (Puar 2017; Jones 2023).Yet despite many valid critiques of how conceptually capacious necropolitics has become, as we wrote in our original piece: "There is a real danger in

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251408092

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thom2026,
  title        = {{Necropolitics, Gaza, and the limits of theory}},
  author       = {Thom Davies et al.},
  journal      = {Progress in Human Geography},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251408092},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Necropolitics, Gaza, and the limits of theory

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.