Understanding the Ethics of Generative AI: Established and New Ethical Principles

Joakim Laine et al.

Communications of the Association for Information Systems2025https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05601article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.59

Abstract

This scoping review develops a conceptual synthesis of the ethics principles of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs). In regard to the emerging literature on GenAI, we explore 1) how established AI ethics principles are presented and 2) what new ethical principles have surfaced. The results indicate that established ethical principles continue to be relevant for GenAI systems but their salience and interpretation may shift, and that there is a need to recognize new principles in these systems. We identify six GenAI ethics principles: 1) respect for intellectual property, 2) truthfulness, 3) robustness, 4) recognition of malicious uses, 5) sociocultural responsibility, and 6) human-centric design. Addressing the challenge of satisfying multiple principles simultaneously, we suggest three meta-principles: categorizing and ranking principles to distinguish fundamental from supporting ones, mapping contradictions between principle pairs to understand their nature, and implementing continuous monitoring of fundamental principles due to the evolving nature of GenAI systems and their applications. To conclude, we suggest increased research emphasis on complementary ethics approaches to principlism, ethical tensions between different ethical viewpoints, end-user perspectives on the explainability and understanding of GenAI, and the salience of ethics principles to various GenAI stakeholders.

13 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05601

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joakim2025,
  title        = {{Understanding the Ethics of Generative AI: Established and New Ethical Principles}},
  author       = {Joakim Laine et al.},
  journal      = {Communications of the Association for Information Systems},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05601},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding the Ethics of Generative AI: Established and New Ethical Principles

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.59

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.60 × 0.4 = 0.24
M · momentum0.82 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.