Digital Footprints and Machine Learning in Psychological Assessment

Renato Gil Gomes Carvalho & Daniel Castro

European Psychologist2025https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000549article
AJG 1
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

The digitalization of psychological assessment has introduced new paradigms in the collection, processing, and analysis of data. This paper explores the transformation of psychological testing and assessment in the context of digital footprints and the rise of machine learning (ML) tools. The emergence of smartphones, wearables, and social media platforms has allowed for the collection of passive data, significantly impacting how psychological states are evaluated. This shift offers enhanced insights into personality traits and psychological symptoms, while reducing reliance on traditional self-report methods. However, the use of machine learning to interpret large volumes of behavioral data raises concerns about ethical implications, particularly regarding privacy, consent, and algorithmic transparency. Furthermore, methodological challenges, such as the reliability and validity of AI-based assessments, complicate the integration of these tools into mainstream psychological practice. This paper aims to critically evaluate the benefits and limitations of digital footprints and ML in psychological assessment, emphasizing the need for ethical frameworks and robust methodologies to ensure their effective and safe implementation.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000549

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{renato2025,
  title        = {{Digital Footprints and Machine Learning in Psychological Assessment}},
  author       = {Renato Gil Gomes Carvalho & Daniel Castro},
  journal      = {European Psychologist},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000549},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Digital Footprints and Machine Learning in Psychological Assessment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.