Understanding partial ostracism across varied social contexts

Maayan Dvir

Journal of Social Psychology2025https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2572658article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.46

What the paper says

Individuals can receive plenty of attention but still feel ignored. This paper expands Williams's work on ostracism - being ignored and excluded - by demonstrating that partial ostracism operates through different paths: inconsistent attention, selective inclusion, or superficial recognition that ignores essential aspects of a person's identity. I trace how partial ostracism research evolved from Cyberball's irregular inclusion to <i>out of the loop</i> informational exclusion. I then demonstrate how sexual objectification represents a form of partial ostracism where women feel ostracized despite receiving focused attention because the recognition centers on their appearance while disregarding their personhood. This challenges the previous assumption that receiving attention is the polar opposite to being ostracized. It also opens the possibility that partial ostracism manifests across diverse contexts, such as: inconsistent caregiving that forms anxious attachment or workplace tokenism that makes minority members hypervisible yet marginalized. These examples reveal the potential pervasiveness of partial ostracism in everyday social interactions, underscoring the importance of systematic investigation.

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2572658

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maayan2025,
  title        = {{Understanding partial ostracism across varied social contexts}},
  author       = {Maayan Dvir},
  journal      = {Journal of Social Psychology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2572658},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding partial ostracism across varied social contexts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.