arbiter
JournalsAccount

Power and Ideology in Close Relationships

Nickola C. Overall & Matthew D. Hammond

Annual Review of Psychology2025https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-012325-032022review
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

This review specifies how individuals' relationship power (actor power) and their partners' power (partner power) influence distinct behaviors in close relationships. High-power actors can promote their own needs, whereas low-power actors must inhibit their needs or enact aggression or manipulation to fight for their needs. Actors must also accommodate the needs of high-power partners but can neglect or may feel obliged to protect low-power partners. Structural power asymmetries outside relationships prompt ideologies that shape perceptions, expectations, and subsequent behavioral responses to power within relationships. Using gender ideologies to illustrate, competitive ideologies (hostile sexism) motivate aggression by those who fight for power or prompt inhibition by those who cede power. Cooperative ideologies (benevolent sexism) divide power, generating accommodation of partners' needs in some domains and neglect in others. We emphasize the need to consider actor and partner power, relationship and structural power, power symmetries and asymmetries, and competitive and cooperative ideologies.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-012325-032022

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nickola2025,
  title        = {{Power and Ideology in Close Relationships}},
  author       = {Nickola C. Overall & Matthew D. Hammond},
  journal      = {Annual Review of Psychology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-012325-032022},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Power and Ideology in Close Relationships

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.