Public-private partnerships caught in a trust-trap and the potential role of information: the burden of divergent rationales

Moritz Kappler et al.

European Journal of Government and Economics2024https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2024.13.1.9773article
ABDC C
Weight
0.38

What the paper says

Trust is known to be beneficial for cooperation, though remains underdeveloped in public-private partnerships (PPPs), which are caught in a trust trap due to the cooperative regime’s internal heterogeneity. Accordingly, PPP’s inherent trust relationship is disentangled, and the burden of divergent actor rationales is introduced. We hypothesize that potential PPPs find themselves ex ante in a situation that requires certain repair mechanisms before the ‘usual’ venues of trust development can become effective. As such, exogenous information is theorized as quasi-substitute for relational experience that may support the development of a ‘leap of faith’. Theoretical considerations are tested by a vignette experiment with representatives of both the public and the private sector. Within and between-group analyses find strong support for the burden of divergent rationales and stable levels of (role-based) trust. However, the effect of the information treatment on trust levels is limited.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2024.13.1.9773

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{moritz2024,
  title        = {{Public-private partnerships caught in a trust-trap and the potential role of information: the burden of divergent rationales}},
  author       = {Moritz Kappler et al.},
  journal      = {European Journal of Government and Economics},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2024.13.1.9773},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Public-private partnerships caught in a trust-trap and the potential role of information: the burden of divergent rationales

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.38

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.18 × 0.4 = 0.07
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.