Going for gold: A prospective assessment of the economic impacts of the Commonwealth Games 2014 on the East End of Glasgow

Julie Clark & Ade Kearns

Environment and Planning C: politics and space2016https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x15624923article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.70

Abstract

Host cities have increasingly sought to combine the staging of a multi-sports event with the regeneration of run-down areas. Like London 2012, Glasgow has sought to use the Commonwealth Games 2014 as a catalyst for the physical, social and economic renewal of its East End. This paper presents a novel approach to the assessment of legacy for a host community which recognises the complexity of potential impacts, without assuming a trickle-down effect to the local area. This comprises a holistic approach to evaluation, encompassing consideration of plausibility, the specifics of people and place, and legacy programmes. Three requirements for sustained economic legacy impacts for the host community are identified: continued and extended partnership working at a strategic level; extending the scope and duration of legacy programmes beyond that required for the event itself; resolving inherent tensions between delivering legacy at different spatial scales, and ensuring the equitable treatment of disadvantaged areas.

15 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x15624923

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{julie2016,
  title        = {{Going for gold: A prospective assessment of the economic impacts of the Commonwealth Games 2014 on the East End of Glasgow}},
  author       = {Julie Clark & Ade Kearns},
  journal      = {Environment and Planning C: politics and space},
  year         = {2016},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x15624923},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Going for gold: A prospective assessment of the economic impacts of the Commonwealth Games 2014 on the East End of Glasgow

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.70

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.97 × 0.4 = 0.39
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.