arbiter
JournalsAccount

Is the pilot policy for carbon emission trading beneficial for ESG disclosure? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Xingqiang Du et al.

China Journal of Accounting Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2554053article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Using the pilot policy for carbon emission trading (PPCET) in China as a quasi-natural experiment setting, we construct a staggered difference-in-difference design to examine the impact of PPCET on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) disclosure. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms over 2009–2020, our findings reveal that the degree of ESG disclosure is significantly higher for treatment firms after implementing PPCET than that before implementing. Moreover, the effect of PPCET on ESG disclosure is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than for non-SOEs. Our findings are robust to a variety of sensitivity tests, are valid after excluding shocks from other policies, and stand after controlling for the endogeneity. Furthermore, the relation between PPCET and ESG disclosure is more pronounced for firms with weak environmental regulation intensity, in non-heavily polluting industries, and with low analyst coverage. Lastly, PPCET promotes environmental and social disclosures, and reduces carbon emission intensity.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2554053

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xingqiang2025,
  title        = {{Is the pilot policy for carbon emission trading beneficial for ESG disclosure? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China}},
  author       = {Xingqiang Du et al.},
  journal      = {China Journal of Accounting Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2554053},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Is the pilot policy for carbon emission trading beneficial for ESG disclosure? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.