arbiter
JournalsAccount

Digital Nudging for Healthy and Sustainable Food Choice in Online Supermarkets: A Scoping Review

Maryam M.E. Alsaeed et al.

AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction2025https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00226article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

As consumers increasingly use online supermarkets for grocery shopping, system designers can use digital nudges (e.g., food swap suggestions, shopping cart calorie counter) to promote healthier and more sustainable food choices in online supermarkets. We conducted a scoping review of 74 papers from computing, health, marketing, and psychology to investigate how system designers can use digital nudges in online grocery stores to influence food choices. Building on the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) model, this review presents a conceptual framework that summarizes 1) the different nudging types used in this context, 2) the influence on human processing and perception, and 3) the effectiveness of digital nudges for driving food choice at the individual, product selection, and shopping cart level.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00226

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maryam2025,
  title        = {{Digital Nudging for Healthy and Sustainable Food Choice in Online Supermarkets: A Scoping Review}},
  author       = {Maryam M.E. Alsaeed et al.},
  journal      = {AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00226},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Digital Nudging for Healthy and Sustainable Food Choice in Online Supermarkets: A Scoping Review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.