‘A Fool's Errand’? A Critical Reparative Perspective on Labour, Care and Advocacy in the Charitable Food Aid System

Kayleigh; id_orcid 0000-0002-6554-4143 Garthwaite

Antipode2026https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70144article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

As charitable and community food aid expands amid deepening inequality, the experiences of frontline workers and volunteers remain underexplored. Drawing on a multi‐sited ethnography across six countries in North America and Europe, this paper centres those working and volunteering in food charity to examine the invisible labour, moral injury and emotional contradictions of food aid, where care and solidarity coexist with complicity in systemic failure. Low‐paid staff and unpaid volunteers sustain market‐driven models while navigating their own precarity. Using a critical reparative lens, the paper reframes moral injury as a terrain through which frontline actors negotiate the tensions between care, complicity and repair. In doing so, it advances a comparative and reparative approach that brings moral injury into dialogue with feminist ethics of care, showing how frontline actors negotiate the tensions between complicity and care to create radical possibilities for solidarity and repair within systems designed to sustain inequality.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70144

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kayleigh;2026,
  title        = {{‘A Fool's Errand’? A Critical Reparative Perspective on Labour, Care and Advocacy in the Charitable Food Aid System}},
  author       = {Kayleigh; id_orcid 0000-0002-6554-4143 Garthwaite},
  journal      = {Antipode},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70144},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

‘A Fool's Errand’? A Critical Reparative Perspective on Labour, Care and Advocacy in the Charitable Food Aid System

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.