arbiter
JournalsAccount

THE NEGATIVE BASIS: BUY THE BOND OR SELL CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP PROTECTION?

Niklas Knecht & Jan-Frederik Mai

International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance2025https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024926500020article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The difference between the credit spread associated with a bond and the par spread associated with selling credit default swap (CDS) protection on the bond issuer is known as the bond’s negative basis. It is an important quantity for credit investors in order to decide whether it is more lucrative to buy a bond or to sell CDS protection. This definition, however, constitutes an inaccurate measurement devoid of a rigorous backing by classical arbitrage pricing theory, since it implicitly ignores the possibility of a credit event and also does not accurately take into account potential differences regarding the cash requirements of bond and CDS. We provide an accurate definition for the negative basis, generalizing an idea originated in [J.-F. Mai (2019) Pricing-hedging duality for credit default swaps and the negative basis arbitrage, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 22 (6), 1950032]. While the latter reference still hinges on a no arbitrage assumption in an implicit market model that is not always satisfied, we adopt a logic that is valid without restrictive assumptions but universally valid in practice. Our definition is shown to be identical in the case when the implicit no arbitrage assumption in [J.-F. Mai (2019) Pricing-hedging duality for credit default swaps and the negative basis arbitrage, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 22 (6), 1950032] happens to hold. We thereby complete a sound theoretical framework that clarifies and justifies how the negative basis must be defined. Furthermore, our framework is general enough to deal with discrete and floating rate bond coupons, and also adapts to the situation when bond and CDS have different currency denomination, so that all cases of practical relevance are included.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024926500020

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{niklas2025,
  title        = {{THE NEGATIVE BASIS: BUY THE BOND OR SELL CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP PROTECTION?}},
  author       = {Niklas Knecht & Jan-Frederik Mai},
  journal      = {International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024926500020},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

THE NEGATIVE BASIS: BUY THE BOND OR SELL CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP PROTECTION?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.