arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Intermediate-level AI-supported accounting practices and financial reporting quality among female artisan entrepreneurs in Ghana

Clemence Dupey Agbenorxevi et al.

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jepp-08-2024-0150article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This article investigates the moderating-mediation roles of value-risk perception and digital financial literacy between AI accounting tools adoption and financial reporting quality for decision-making among family firms in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach A snowball sampling technique was used in the selection of 367 female artisan entrepreneurs in Accra and Ho (2 major cities in Ghana). Regression analysis was used to assess the hypothesized paths. Findings The findings show that value-risk perception moderates the mediated link between digital financial literacy and financial reporting quality among female artisanal entrepreneurs in Ghana. Research limitations/implications The article fails to take into account changing behavioral dynamics of female artisan entrepreneurs’ overtime. Originality/value The article is one of the first to explore AI adoption for intermediate accounting practices among female artisan entrepreneurs in an emerging economy.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jepp-08-2024-0150

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{clemence2026,
  title        = {{Intermediate-level AI-supported accounting practices and financial reporting quality among female artisan entrepreneurs in Ghana}},
  author       = {Clemence Dupey Agbenorxevi et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jepp-08-2024-0150},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Intermediate-level AI-supported accounting practices and financial reporting quality among female artisan entrepreneurs in Ghana

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.