arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

PARTIAL PRIVATIZATION UNDER ASYMMETRIC MULTI‐MARKET COMPETITION

Akio Kawasaki & Tohru Naito

Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies2019https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12098article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Under the assumption that a public firm provides goods or services to two markets and that a private firm provides goods or services to one market only, this study examines whether public firms should be privatized. It also investigates how the production quantity of a private firm changes when its degree of privatization increases. We find that when the market share of a duopoly market is large (small), partial privatization (nationalization) is socially preferable. We also find that the quantity produced by the private firm does not always increase along with the degree of privatization.

6 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12098

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{akio2019,
  title        = {{PARTIAL PRIVATIZATION UNDER ASYMMETRIC MULTI‐MARKET COMPETITION}},
  author       = {Akio Kawasaki & Tohru Naito},
  journal      = {Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies},
  year         = {2019},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12098},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

PARTIAL PRIVATIZATION UNDER ASYMMETRIC MULTI‐MARKET COMPETITION

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.17
M · momentum0.73 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.