A Thing that Works: A Case Study of Success at the Urban Margins

Javier Auyero et al.

Journal of Latin American Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x25101193article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Mass street protests and other highly contentious actions often capture headlines and public attention, but what remains after the news cycle moves on? Many times, grassroots initiatives crystallise during or after these intense moments of participation, leaving in their wake effective organisations that continue to make daily life more liveable in contexts of extreme vulnerability. Despite the persistence and impact of these ‘things that work’ – as we call them – they are often less visible and understudied. How do these initiatives emerge and sustain themselves in the communities in which they work? Using ethnographic methods, we investigate the case of a community centre formed in the wake of a land occupation in the urban periphery of Buenos Aires to answer these questions. We argue that grassroots initiatives build local power through everyday care-work: forming relationships, changing identities and providing valuable services and information.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x25101193

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{javier2025,
  title        = {{A Thing that Works: A Case Study of Success at the Urban Margins}},
  author       = {Javier Auyero et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Latin American Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x25101193},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Thing that Works: A Case Study of Success at the Urban Margins

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.