arbiter
JournalsAccount

A Theory of How Workers Keep up with Inflation

Hassan Afrouzi et al.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjag007article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.44

Abstract

We develop a model that integrates modern theories of labor market flows with nominal wage rigidities to study the consequences of inflation on the labor market. Nominal wage stickiness incentivizes workers to engage in job-to-job transitions after an unexpected increase in the price level. Such dynamics lead to a rise in aggregate vacancies associating a seemingly tight labor market with lower real wages—two facts observed during the recent inflation period. The calibrated model jointly matches aggregate and cross-sectional trends in worker flows and wages during the 2021–2024 period. Using historical data, we show that prior periods of high inflation were also associated with increasing vacancies and upward shifts in the Beveridge curve. Our results suggest that policy makers and academics should be cautious about viewing the rise in the vacancy-to-unemployment rate as a sign of a tight labor market during inflationary periods without holistically looking at other labor market indicators.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjag007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hassan2026,
  title        = {{A Theory of How Workers Keep up with Inflation}},
  author       = {Hassan Afrouzi et al.},
  journal      = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjag007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Theory of How Workers Keep up with Inflation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.