Opposing Sketches of the Clergy as Literati During the Scottish Enlightenment: Hugh Blair and John Witherspoon

Paul D. Mueller

Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology2023https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542023000041a007book-chapter
ABDC C
Weight
0.64

What the paper says

The Scottish Enlightenment, which gave birth to classical liberal thought and political economy, developed out of a strong theological tradition and was marked by significant theological conflict. Most people understand the Scottish Enlightenment through the works of David Hume, Adam Smith, and their intellectual circle of Moderate clergy and literati. Though this group represents the dominant strain of thinking in the Scottish Enlightenment, one should not neglect other important contributions made by more orthodox clergy and literati. Comparing the ideas of less well-known, but leading figures of the Moderate and the orthodox literati, Hugh Blair and John Witherspoon, reveals different views on doctrines related to salvation, human nature, and God’s providence, as well as on the nature of moral judgment and education. These differences provide important context for understanding the ideas and arguments of more influential philosophers like Smith and Hume.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542023000041a007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paul2023,
  title        = {{Opposing Sketches of the Clergy as Literati During the Scottish Enlightenment: Hugh Blair and John Witherspoon}},
  author       = {Paul D. Mueller},
  journal      = {Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542023000041a007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Opposing Sketches of the Clergy as Literati During the Scottish Enlightenment: Hugh Blair and John Witherspoon

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.64

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.73 × 0.4 = 0.29
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.