The development and trial of systematic visual search: a visual inspection method designed to improve current workplace risk assessment practice

Victor Hrymak & Jan de Vries

Policy and Practice in Health and Safety2020https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2019.1708615article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Visual inspection is a core element in hazard identification. However, poorly conducted visual inspections are problematical for workplace inspection practice as observable hazards that should be seen, are often missed. To address this problem, a novel method; systematic visual search, was developed and tested under randomised controlled trial conditions using commercial kitchens as workplaces. A total of 211 participants were recruited and in the control condition, N = 104 conducted their visual inspection as normal. In the experimental condition, N = 107 received training in the use of systematic visual search. Control group participants were only able to identify a circa mean 33% of observable hazards in the kitchens. In contrast experimental group participants, using systematic visual search, observed a circa mean 50% of observable hazards present. This 17% improvement was highly significant, with a large effect size (p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.85).

10 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2019.1708615

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{victor2020,
  title        = {{The development and trial of systematic visual search: a visual inspection method designed to improve current workplace risk assessment practice}},
  author       = {Victor Hrymak & Jan de Vries},
  journal      = {Policy and Practice in Health and Safety},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2019.1708615},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The development and trial of systematic visual search: a visual inspection method designed to improve current workplace risk assessment practice

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.40 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.