arbiter
JournalsAccount

The garden of evaluation approaches: Supporting explicit, theory-informed evaluation practice

Daniela C. Schröter et al.

Evaluation2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261421931article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article presents an expanded Garden of Evaluation Approaches, a multidimensional framework that bridges theory and practice to strengthen evaluation in complex global contexts. The Garden now maps 13 approaches across intersecting dimensions and introduces two new elements: evaluand focus and lifecycle timing. Developed through systematic review and rubric-based analysis, it operationalises theoretical distinctions into visual profiles and evidence-based resource guides, enabling comparative learning, hybridisation, and context-sensitive design. By integrating underrepresented paradigms alongside established models, the Garden advances pluralism, equity, and methodological innovation. At the same time, it contributes to scholarly debates on classification logic and paradigm integration, offering a dynamic platform for research, pedagogy, and capacity-building. Designed as a living framework, the Garden invites co-creation and adaptation, positioning itself as both a practical decision-support tool and a catalyst for advancing evaluation theory and global practice.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261421931

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniela2026,
  title        = {{The garden of evaluation approaches: Supporting explicit, theory-informed evaluation practice}},
  author       = {Daniela C. Schröter et al.},
  journal      = {Evaluation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261421931},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The garden of evaluation approaches: Supporting explicit, theory-informed evaluation practice

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.