arbiter
JournalsAccount

Reviewing ‘Denunciation’ and ‘Renegotiation’ as Strategies to Minimize the Expansive Interpretations of Investment Treaty Laws

Khorsed Zaman

Adelaide Law Review2019article
ABDC A
Weight
0.26

Abstract

No abstract available.

Cite this paper

@article{khorsed2019,
  title        = {{Reviewing ‘Denunciation’ and ‘Renegotiation’ as Strategies to Minimize the Expansive Interpretations of Investment Treaty Laws}},
  author       = {Khorsed Zaman},
  journal      = {Adelaide Law Review},
  year         = {2019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reviewing ‘Denunciation’ and ‘Renegotiation’ as Strategies to Minimize the Expansive Interpretations of Investment Treaty Laws

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.