In Search of Shares: Benchmarked Ownership, Short Covering, and Price Efficiency

Sanjeev Bhojraj et al.

Management Science2026https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07231article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We examine whether ownership by benchmarked investors constrains short sellers’ ability to quickly cover their positions following positive earnings news and thereby exacerbates price pressure from short covering. We find that high benchmarked ownership is related to greater price overshooting in highly shorted stocks at positive earnings announcements. This effect is driven by benchmarked ownership amplifying both price and volume impacts of short covering. Exploring shocks from Russell index reconstitutions and examining other settings such as management guidance and analyst recommendation revisions yield similar inferences. Overall, our findings highlight a novel mechanism that benchmarked ownership can constrain short-selling activities. This paper was accepted by Eric So, accounting. Funding: The authors acknowledge financial assistance from their respective schools. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07231 .

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07231

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sanjeev2026,
  title        = {{In Search of Shares: Benchmarked Ownership, Short Covering, and Price Efficiency}},
  author       = {Sanjeev Bhojraj et al.},
  journal      = {Management Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07231},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

In Search of Shares: Benchmarked Ownership, Short Covering, and Price Efficiency

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.