arbiter
JournalsAccount

The contest between central bank digital currencies, stablecoins, and tokenized deposits: Which will likely win, and why?

Ross P Buckley

Capital Markets Law Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmag012article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

International payments are arguably the least efficient part of most financial systems and are thus ripe for disruption. Before 2025, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) appeared to be the most likely vehicle for such disruption, given monetary systems are best built on the settlement finality of central bank money. This changed in 2025 with the support of the Trump Administration for stablecoins. There is now a contest between stablecoins, CBDCs and tokenized bank deposits to underpin international payments in the future. This article analyses the three different architectures and argues that tokenized deposits are the most likely to prevail longer term.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmag012

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ross2026,
  title        = {{The contest between central bank digital currencies, stablecoins, and tokenized deposits: Which will likely win, and why?}},
  author       = {Ross P Buckley},
  journal      = {Capital Markets Law Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmag012},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The contest between central bank digital currencies, stablecoins, and tokenized deposits: Which will likely win, and why?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.