The impact of embeddedness (in)congruence on reverse knowledge transfer – An agency theory perspective

Lei Wang & Yang Yu

Journal of International Management2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2026.101351article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Reverse knowledge transfer (RKT) is critical for multinational corporations (MNCs), yet its relationship with subsidiary embeddedness, particularly given varied internal and external dimensions, remains unclear. This limits our understanding of how to manage subsidiary embeddedness to maximize RKT. Drawing on a congruence perspective and agency theory, we argue that agency problems arise when internal and external embeddedness are incongruent; thus, RKT is maximized when these two dimensions are congruent, regardless of their absolute levels. Using polynomial regression and response surface methodology, we test this congruence effect and examine the moderating effects of cultural distance and MNCs' host-country experience. Our study offers insights into the diverse configurations of subsidiary embeddedness and contributes a novel perspective on parent-subsidiary relationships and knowledge flows within MNCs.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2026.101351

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lei2026,
  title        = {{The impact of embeddedness (in)congruence on reverse knowledge transfer – An agency theory perspective}},
  author       = {Lei Wang & Yang Yu},
  journal      = {Journal of International Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2026.101351},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The impact of embeddedness (in)congruence on reverse knowledge transfer – An agency theory perspective

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.