Do You See What I See? Leader–Follower Congruence in Authentic Leadership and Employee Participation

Hsing‐Er Lin et al.

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.70050article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study investigates the impacts of authentic leadership from both leader and follower perspectives and explores the effect of perceptual congruence, the level of agreement between the leaders' and followers' evaluations on the leaders' authentic leadership, on employee participation. Through two studies, using a sample of 102 leader‐member dyads from the United States in Study 1 and a sample of 71 R&D teams from Taiwan in Study 2, we found that employee participation is highest when leaders and followers share a high level of perceptual agreement on authentic leadership. These findings highlight the important research and practical implications of examining authentic leadership through a perceptual congruence perspective.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.70050

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hsing‐er2026,
  title        = {{Do You See What I See? Leader–Follower Congruence in Authentic Leadership and Employee Participation}},
  author       = {Hsing‐Er Lin et al.},
  journal      = {Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.70050},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Do You See What I See? Leader–Follower Congruence in Authentic Leadership and Employee Participation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.