Being and selling yourself: Unemployment, employability and the limits of identity regulation

John Foster

Human Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261429839article
FT50AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Are there limits on what we can reasonably be asked to become? The concept of employability teaches the construction of new models of working identity – ones that emphasise personal traits and passions. It motivates recipients to become employable by ‘working’ on the self – such that a person’s identity becomes saleable on the job market. This article examines employability through its impact on those specifically asked to become employable – members of work clubs for the unemployed. Stemming from a 12-month, primarily ethnographic, study of unemployed experience, the article describes the nature of employability in practice and specifically the tensions experienced by long-term unemployed people who are repeatedly asked to manufacture a more employable version of themselves. Employability is assessed as a form of identity regulation which prompts individuals to construct themselves as continuously employable over time. The struggles surrounding this endeavour – as experienced by the unemployed research participants – point to the parameters and limits of identities specified within relations of power and the social consequences for those unable or unwilling to become what they are expected to be.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261429839

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{john2026,
  title        = {{Being and selling yourself: Unemployment, employability and the limits of identity regulation}},
  author       = {John Foster},
  journal      = {Human Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261429839},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Being and selling yourself: Unemployment, employability and the limits of identity regulation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.