Redefining influence: how a feminist advocacy group reformed paternity leave in Spain through insider women’s alliances

Manuel Alvariño

Journal of Public Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x25100925article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

How do citizen interest groups influence policy in domains dominated by political and economic elites? Recent research suggests their success hinges on outsider strategies to pressure policymakers, such as mobilizing public opinion. In contrast, a feminist platform named Platform for Equal and Non-transferable Birth and Adoption Leave (PPiiNA) built insider alliances with female politicians across party lines to make paternity and maternity leave equal and non-transferable in Spain in 2019. This article explores this case in depth by tracing almost 20 years of policy evolution through parliamentary documents and interviews. Against employer opposition and the absence of trade unions, the case corroborates the relevance of women in politics by illustrating how descriptive representation can open insider channels of influence to feminist advocacy groups. Nonetheless, the approval of the reform ultimately depended on left-wing governing power, while policy formulation was dominated by political elites and employer groups, limiting the capacity of cross-partisan feminist alliances to shape final policy output.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x25100925

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{manuel2026,
  title        = {{Redefining influence: how a feminist advocacy group reformed paternity leave in Spain through insider women’s alliances}},
  author       = {Manuel Alvariño},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x25100925},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Redefining influence: how a feminist advocacy group reformed paternity leave in Spain through insider women’s alliances

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.