Bayesian Computing in the Undergraduate Statistics Curriculum

Jim Albert & Jingchen Hu

Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education2020https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1847008article
ABDC B
Weight
0.51

What the paper says

Bayesian statistics has gained great momentum since the computational developments of the 1990s. Gradually, advances in Bayesian methodology and software have made Bayesian techniques much more accessible to applied statisticians and, in turn, have potentially transformed Bayesian education at the undergraduate level. This article provides an overview of the various options for implementing Bayesian computational methods motivated to achieve particular learning outcomes. For each computational method, we propose activities and exercises, and discuss each method’s pedagogical advantages and disadvantages based on our experience in the classroom. The goal is to present guidance on the choice of computation for the instructors who are introducing Bayesian methods in their undergraduate statistics curriculum. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

11 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1847008

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jim2020,
  title        = {{Bayesian Computing in the Undergraduate Statistics Curriculum}},
  author       = {Jim Albert & Jingchen Hu},
  journal      = {Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1847008},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bayesian Computing in the Undergraduate Statistics Curriculum

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.51

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.42 × 0.4 = 0.17
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.