Do mindsets really matter? A second look at how perceptions of social media experiences relate to well-being

Douglas A. Parry & Bronwynè Coetzee

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf011article
AJG 3
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Building on the idea that subjective evaluations of social media use (SMU) may shape well-being effects, this study investigated how two “social media mindsets”—agency (perceived control over SMU) and valence (perceived effects of SMU)—relate to self-reported and logged SMU, and four well-being indicators (depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction) in a South African sample of young adults (N = 1,858; M age = 21.01). Agency mindsets were negatively correlated with SMU and positively with well-being, while valence mindsets were associated with higher SMU but not with well-being. Logged SMU showed weaker associations with mindsets and well-being than self-reported SMU, suggesting differences between perceived and actual behavior. The findings replicate, extend, and in some cases contradict prior research, emphasizing how users’ sense of control is more important for well-being than SMU duration or perceptions of its effects, and that more work is needed to understand whether the “mindsets” concept is fruitful.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf011

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{douglas2025,
  title        = {{Do mindsets really matter? A second look at how perceptions of social media experiences relate to well-being}},
  author       = {Douglas A. Parry & Bronwynè Coetzee},
  journal      = {Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf011},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Do mindsets really matter? A second look at how perceptions of social media experiences relate to well-being

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.