Funding Internationalisation of Education in Portugal: Evidence From Higher and Non‐Higher Education Institutions

Cristina Sin et al.

Higher Education Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70124article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT This paper investigates how education and training institutions in Portugal fund internationalisation, moving beyond the traditional focus on higher education. Employing a convergent parallel mixed‐methods design through a nationwide survey and interviews, it reveals a two‐tiered system shaped by funding availability and diversity. Higher education institutions leverage a diversified portfolio of internal, national, and European funds to fuel ambitious, competitive agendas that reflect their complex missions. In contrast, the non‐tertiary sectors (School, Adult and Vocational Education) are critically dependent on a single source, Erasmus+, a dependency that channels their efforts primarily towards mobility, constraining their strategic autonomy and creating a structural inequality within the national system. The study argues that funding is not a neutral facilitator but a powerful force that influences the scope and nature of internationalisation. It concludes by proposing future research avenues and policy actions to foster more equitable international engagement across sectors.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70124

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cristina2026,
  title        = {{Funding Internationalisation of Education in Portugal: Evidence From Higher and Non‐Higher Education Institutions}},
  author       = {Cristina Sin et al.},
  journal      = {Higher Education Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70124},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Funding Internationalisation of Education in Portugal: Evidence From Higher and Non‐Higher Education Institutions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.