Optimal satellite shielding and orbital debris

Anelí Bongers et al.

Journal of Industrial and Business Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-026-00392-5article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Orbital debris, or space junk, is a major environmental externality that poses serious risks to human activity in outer space. The rapid increase in satellites and spacecraft from commercial, military, and scientific missions has intensified space pollution, leaving millions of debris fragments orbiting Earth at high velocities. This proliferation raises the likelihood of collisions and the destruction of operational spacecraft. This paper examines how spacecraft shielding affects both collision-related damage and debris generation. Shielding lowers the probability of satellite breakup during collisions, helping limit the creation of additional debris. It illustrates how spacefaring firms can mitigate the environmental costs of space activity through individual actions, even within a decentralized, profit-driven framework. Our analysis shows that when satellite operators invest in reducing collision risks and potential destruction, their behavior partially internalizes the externality, improving orbital sustainability. However, the optimal level of shielding in a decentralized economy remains below that achieved under a centralized framework, demonstrating that market mechanisms only partially address the negative externality.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-026-00392-5

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anelí2026,
  title        = {{Optimal satellite shielding and orbital debris}},
  author       = {Anelí Bongers et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Industrial and Business Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-026-00392-5},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Optimal satellite shielding and orbital debris

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.