The Accounting Pipeline Shortage: Are We Making Progress? Evidence on Workload, Job Satisfaction, and Compensation

Ryan T. Dunn et al.

Accounting Horizons2026https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2024-196article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

SYNOPSIS The accounting profession faces a persistent pipeline shortage, with steep declines in graduates and CPA candidates raising concerns about audit quality, tax compliance, and financial reporting. Compensation and work-life balance concerns are often cited as reasons for the shortage. Using a novel dataset of 14,652 individual-year observations from 2021 to 2024, we document recent trends in real compensation, average weekly hours, and the link between workload and job satisfaction. Results show a significant decrease in weekly hours of 2.3 per week (4.7 percent), with reductions across the board but largest among mid-level staff and non-Big 4 firms. Our results also show fewer hours are associated with higher job satisfaction. By contrast, real compensation has decreased $3,686 (3.7 percent), with the sharpest declines at senior levels and in the consulting service line. Our findings highlight both progress and limits: firms are easing workload pressures, but continued declines in real compensation may hinder long-term retention. Data Availability: Data are available from the authors upon request. JEL Classifications: M12; M40; M41; M42.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2024-196

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ryan2026,
  title        = {{The Accounting Pipeline Shortage: Are We Making Progress? Evidence on Workload, Job Satisfaction, and Compensation}},
  author       = {Ryan T. Dunn et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting Horizons},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2024-196},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Accounting Pipeline Shortage: Are We Making Progress? Evidence on Workload, Job Satisfaction, and Compensation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.