The practice barometer: towards an anti-cannibal and trans-environmental agenda

Klara Scheurenbrand & Verena Gruber

Journal of Marketing Management2026https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2026.2638747article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This integrative review introduces the ‘practice barometer’ as a conceptual tool to assess and guide practice-based sustainability research in sociology and marketing. Drawing on an integrative analysis of the existing literature, we argue for the relevance of practice theory as a powerful framework for understanding sustainability, critiquing capitalism, and advancing scholarship. We outline a trans-environmental, anti-cannibal agenda for future research by combining Fraser’s theory of cannibal capitalism and Schatzki’s account of large phenomena. Positioned as a cross-disciplinary project, this agenda calls on scholars to move beyond disciplinary silos, ask deeper ontological questions, and engage in forms of scholarship that brave institutional constraints – advancing sustainability as a research practice, not merely a topic of study.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2026.2638747

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{klara2026,
  title        = {{The practice barometer: towards an anti-cannibal and trans-environmental agenda}},
  author       = {Klara Scheurenbrand & Verena Gruber},
  journal      = {Journal of Marketing Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2026.2638747},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The practice barometer: towards an anti-cannibal and trans-environmental agenda

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.