R&D area diversity and innovation quality: a cross-functional absorptive capacity perspective

Tianyu Hou et al.

International Journal of Technology Management2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2025.144792article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Although many studies have investigated how the diversity of R&D human capital influences innovation performance, the impact of the diversity of functional areas in R&D centres remains poorly understood. Drawing on the absorptive capacity framework, this study examines how R&D area diversity influences innovation quality. As R&D activities are embedded in organisational social networks and knowledge networks, we further investigate how social cohesion, knowledge cohesion, and social-knowledge cohesion moderate the effect of R&D area diversity on innovation quality. We argue that R&D area diversity improves intra-organisational cross-function absorptive capacity, which enhances innovation quality. The positive effect of R&D area diversity increases when social cohesion and knowledge cohesion are high, and the coupling of social-knowledge cohesion is low. An analysis of a large longitudinal dataset of 3,061 firm-year observations covering 486 global pharmaceutical firms provides strong support for our hypotheses. We end with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2025.144792

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tianyu2025,
  title        = {{R&D area diversity and innovation quality: a cross-functional absorptive capacity perspective}},
  author       = {Tianyu Hou et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Technology Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2025.144792},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

R&D area diversity and innovation quality: a cross-functional absorptive capacity perspective

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.