arbiter
JournalsAccount

Cultural Tightness–Looseness and International Expansion of Emerging Market Firms: A Cultural Escapism Perspective

Xuchang Chen

Management International Review2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00612-5article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Drawing on cultural tightness–looseness theory and institutional escapism view, this study develops a cultural escapism perspective to examine the impact of within-country cultural heterogeneity in emerging market context, specifically subnational cultural tightness–looseness, on firms’ outward foreign direct investment. Tight culture is characterized by strict social norms with low tolerance for deviant behaviors within a society. This study examines how emerging market firms navigate the constraints of cultural tightness through internationalization, such that firms located in culturally tight regions are more likely to engage in international expansion. In addition, the strength of the relationship between cultural tightness and a firm’s international expansion is contingent on government R&D subsidies and industry technological dynamism. The hypotheses are tested and supported through an analysis of Chinese listed firms during the period of 2007 to 2019. The cultural escapism perspective contributes to cultural tightness–looseness theory and international business research.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00612-5

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xuchang2026,
  title        = {{Cultural Tightness–Looseness and International Expansion of Emerging Market Firms: A Cultural Escapism Perspective}},
  author       = {Xuchang Chen},
  journal      = {Management International Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00612-5},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cultural Tightness–Looseness and International Expansion of Emerging Market Firms: A Cultural Escapism Perspective

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.