arbiter
JournalsAccount

Unlocking firm innovation under regional disadvantage: Can psychological openness compensate?

Markus Grillitsch et al.

Research Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2026.105463article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Firm innovation is strongly shaped by regional endowment – defined here as regional supply- and demand-side conditions for innovation – yet many regions are disadvantaged by having low levels of such endowment. While recent research increasingly emphasizes the role of regional soft factors , such as psychological openness, we still know relatively little about how such factors influence firm innovation under conditions of low structural endowment. Theoretically, we draw on Schmookler's scissors metaphor to conceptualize regional supply and demand conditions as hard, structural endowments of regions. We argue that favorable regional soft conditions – specifically psychological openness – can partially offset these structural constraints, but only for firms that possess sufficient absorptive capacity to recognize, absorb, and exploit such favorable regional conditions. Using longitudinal firm-level data on Swedish firms from 2004 to 2018, we show that regional psychological openness does not have a universal positive effect on product innovation. Instead, our results indicate that the benefits of regional openness are concentrated among firms with higher absorptive capacity operating in regions with low endowment, while firms in regions with higher endowment do not benefit in the same way. Implications for research and policymaking are discussed. • Regional soft factors are associated with firm innovation outcomes. • Regional psychological openness may offset regional structural disadvantages. • Firms need absorptive capacity to benefit from regional psychological openness. • Hard and soft factors at firm and region levels jointly shape firm innovation. • In high-endowment regions, psychological openness may coincide with lower innovation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2026.105463

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{markus2026,
  title        = {{Unlocking firm innovation under regional disadvantage: Can psychological openness compensate?}},
  author       = {Markus Grillitsch et al.},
  journal      = {Research Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2026.105463},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unlocking firm innovation under regional disadvantage: Can psychological openness compensate?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.