Behavioral Ethics: Does it Have a Role in Helping Develop a Better Understanding of Administrative Ethics?

Kaifeng Yang et al.

American Review of Public Administration2025https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241305413article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Despite considerable advancements in business and psychology, the incorporation of behavioral ethics into public administration has been notably limited. This article introduces the core principles of behavioral ethics and examines their implications for administrative ethics. While this approach has its challenges, behavioral ethics provides valuable insights into the behavioral dynamics that underlie ethical phenomena within public administration. It effectively complements normative research, enhancing our understanding of the micro-foundations of administrative ethics. Adopting a systematic, interdisciplinary, and culturally sensitive approach to behavioral ethics is crucial. This approach should utilize mixed methodologies and incorporate normative perspectives to thoroughly address the deep-seated questions at the core of administrative ethics.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241305413

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kaifeng2025,
  title        = {{Behavioral Ethics: Does it Have a Role in Helping Develop a Better Understanding of Administrative Ethics?}},
  author       = {Kaifeng Yang et al.},
  journal      = {American Review of Public Administration},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241305413},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Behavioral Ethics: Does it Have a Role in Helping Develop a Better Understanding of Administrative Ethics?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.