arbiter
JournalsAccount

What About Men? The Identity and Role of Men Litigants in EU Gender Equality Jurisprudence

Sophia Ayada

European Law Review2021article
ABDC A
Weight
0.26

Abstract

Approximately one fifth of all cases ruled on gender equality grounds by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) have been brought by male applicants. This article investigates their claims and arguments, and their reception by the Court, in order to understand the extent to which male applicants shape EU jurisprudence. It argues that they require the enlargement of the definition of parenthood in order to incorporate their requests to be granted parenthood-related rights, ultimately furthering an anti-stereotypical conception of fatherhood. However, their genderblind approach to fatherhood justifies in pension cases the removal of women’s special advantages and allows the Court to ignore the structural component of gender inequalities. Finally, male applicants foster a meritocratic vision of equality which encapsulates men’s claims to equal treatment but limits the range of measures that can be adopted to promote women’s rights.

Cite this paper

@article{sophia2021,
  title        = {{What About Men? The Identity and Role of Men Litigants in EU Gender Equality Jurisprudence}},
  author       = {Sophia Ayada},
  journal      = {European Law Review},
  year         = {2021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What About Men? The Identity and Role of Men Litigants in EU Gender Equality Jurisprudence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.