arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

A new framework for comparing financial stability risks

Colin Ellis

Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions2025https://doi.org/10.69554/ldrj1455article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Since the global financial crisis of 2007/08, policymakers and market participants alike have paid more attention to financial stability risks, alongside a more longstanding focus on macroeconomic developments. While the emphasis on such risks is welcome, however, it can often be focused solely on specific concerns or issues; there has been relatively little attempt to assess different financial stability risks relative to one another. This opinion piece proposes a simple approach for doing so, based on the building blocks of classical credit analysis. It describes and illustrates a new way of presenting different financial stability risks relative to one another, which would enhance the analysis of both risk managers and policymakers alike.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69554/ldrj1455

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{colin2025,
  title        = {{A new framework for comparing financial stability risks}},
  author       = {Colin Ellis},
  journal      = {Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69554/ldrj1455},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A new framework for comparing financial stability risks

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.