Differential and expositional definitions: flexible yet precise specifications of required or optional attributes

Chitu Okoli

International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmcp.2026.150692article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Good definitions are crucial for most research studies, especially in literature reviews, where topics and concepts must be precisely specified. Attempts to guide scholars in developing clear definitions have mainly emphasised necessary and sufficient definitions (also called intensional definitions) that strictly define things using a minimal set of required terms. Family resemblance concepts have also been suggested when attributes or features are optional. However, many definitions sometimes require complex combinations of some required and some optional terms, which are not adequately addressed by either type of definition. Thus, drawing from formal axiology, we develop two new useful types of definition: differential definitions to specify the minimal reducible notion of what a thing is, including complex term combination logic; and expositional definitions to specify what a thing might optionally be. These types are more flexible and yet precise in specifying the meanings of terms.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmcp.2026.150692

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chitu2025,
  title        = {{Differential and expositional definitions: flexible yet precise specifications of required or optional attributes}},
  author       = {Chitu Okoli},
  journal      = {International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmcp.2026.150692},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Differential and expositional definitions: flexible yet precise specifications of required or optional attributes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.