← Back to results The Illusion of Inclusivity: Analysing the Psychological Factors Affecting Developing Countries in Consensus-Driven International Tax Negotiations G.S. Mukundan
Abstract This article critiques the OECD’s technical, consensus-based tax negotiations for limiting developing countries’ participation. It highlights cognitive biases, conformity pressures and disadvantages for capacity-constrained jurisdictions, drawing on legal and psychological theories. Recommendations are offered for the proposed UN Framework Convention on International Tax.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/2pkz2mk Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{g.s.2025,
title = {{The Illusion of Inclusivity: Analysing the Psychological Factors Affecting Developing Countries in Consensus-Driven International Tax Negotiations}},
author = {G.S. Mukundan},
journal = {Bulletin for International Taxation},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/2pkz2mk},
} TY - JOUR
TI - The Illusion of Inclusivity: Analysing the Psychological Factors Affecting Developing Countries in Consensus-Driven International Tax Negotiations
AU - Mukundan, G.S.
JO - Bulletin for International Taxation
PY - 2025
ER - G.S. Mukundan (2025). The Illusion of Inclusivity: Analysing the Psychological Factors Affecting Developing Countries in Consensus-Driven International Tax Negotiations. *Bulletin for International Taxation*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/2pkz2mk G.S. Mukundan. "The Illusion of Inclusivity: Analysing the Psychological Factors Affecting Developing Countries in Consensus-Driven International Tax Negotiations." *Bulletin for International Taxation* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/2pkz2mk. The Illusion of Inclusivity: Analysing the Psychological Factors Affecting Developing Countries in Consensus-Driven International Tax Negotiations
G.S. Mukundan · Bulletin for International Taxation · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/2pkz2mk Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.