arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Measuring the intrinsic value of choice

Christoph Feldhaus et al.

European Economic Review2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105254article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We propose a method to quantify the intrinsic value of choice as a distinct component of utility separate from outcome-based utility. Using this conceptual approach, we discuss how the instrumental value of choice can be separated from its intrinsic value and derive a measure of the utility loss from constrained choice. In an incentivized online experiment, we estimate the average intrinsic value of choice at 8.9% of participants’ endowments. This suggests that the ability to choose itself constitutes a non-trivial source of utility. This observation has implications for the evaluation of policies and institutions that limit individual choice, such as command-and-control policies, even without altering material outcomes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105254

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christoph2026,
  title        = {{Measuring the intrinsic value of choice}},
  author       = {Christoph Feldhaus et al.},
  journal      = {European Economic Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105254},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Measuring the intrinsic value of choice

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.