arbiter
JournalsAccount

Rethinking Reasonableness in Rape Prosecution: Lessons Learned in the Search for ‘End to End’ Justice in England and Wales

Vanessa E. Munro et al.

The Modern Law Review2025https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.70002article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Across several legal jurisdictions, the history of rape investigation and prosecution is one replete with points of crisis and condemnation, leading to high‐profile reviews and reform. This article draws on original data that explores prosecutorial processes and decision‐making in the context of a recent improvement initiative in England and Wales, known as ‘Operation Soteria’. Though identifying some signs of progress in the context of this initiative, the authors focus on decision‐making in respect of lines of investigative enquiry, belief in consent and prospects of conviction to highlight the malleability of the thresholds of reasonableness upon which case progression is determined. Demonstrating that misconceptions about sexual violence and assessments of evidence based on privileged perspectives too often continue to inform the processes and outcomes of prosecutorial engagement, the article reflects on the prospects for rape justice.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.70002

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{vanessa2025,
  title        = {{Rethinking Reasonableness in Rape Prosecution: Lessons Learned in the Search for ‘End to End’ Justice in England and Wales}},
  author       = {Vanessa E. Munro et al.},
  journal      = {The Modern Law Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.70002},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Rethinking Reasonableness in Rape Prosecution: Lessons Learned in the Search for ‘End to End’ Justice in England and Wales

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.