arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The intra-organisational distribution of learning activities - a conceptual framework

Feng Zhang

International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtlid.2025.149345article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Building upon the different knowledge search and transfer efficiency associated with a concentrated vs. an even distribution of exploration and exploitation within a firm, this article exams a largely neglected structure feature in organisational learning literature, namely the intra-organisational distribution of learning activities. Organisational structure and effective strategic behaviours are critical for firm growth and survival. This study connects learning strategy choices (i.e., an ambidexterity vs. a specialisation strategy) representing firm strategic behaviours with structural considerations (i.e., a concentrated vs. an even distribution of learning activities) in developing a framework facilitating appropriate learning mechanism choices. This study contributes to both the organisational learning and international business literature.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtlid.2025.149345

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{feng2025,
  title        = {{The intra-organisational distribution of learning activities - a conceptual framework}},
  author       = {Feng Zhang},
  journal      = {International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtlid.2025.149345},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The intra-organisational distribution of learning activities - a conceptual framework

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.