arbiter
JournalsAccount

State Capacity, Refugee Reception, and Attitudes towards Refugees

Roman Hlatky

Comparative Political Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251414014article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

What explains opposition to refugees? Aside from cultural, economic, and safety-related threats, existing research suggests that individuals are less tolerant when they think their state lacks the capacity to control external borders. Focusing solely on external borders, however, overlooks another dimension of migration management: reception and integration. I argue that perceptions of a state’s refugee reception capacity shape refugee-related attitudes. Three studies – focusing on Ukrainian refugees in Central and Eastern Europe – provide evidence. Study 1 analyzes opposition to Ukrainian refugees and the reception programs intended to benefit them. Study 2, a design-based analysis, shows that expanding a state’s capacity to manage refugee reception causes individuals to consider refugees less of a problem. Study 3, a pre-registered survey experiment, replicates this finding and investigates whether effects extend beyond problem perception. Findings suggest that investing in effective refugee reception may improve the lives of refugees while also reducing public opposition.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251414014

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{roman2026,
  title        = {{State Capacity, Refugee Reception, and Attitudes towards Refugees}},
  author       = {Roman Hlatky},
  journal      = {Comparative Political Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251414014},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

State Capacity, Refugee Reception, and Attitudes towards Refugees

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.