← Back to results A Scale for Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Studies Based on Observational Methodology Susana Sanduvete‐Chaves et al.
What the paper says MQSOM is a short (11 items), useful instrument for professionals, researchers or assessment commissions when designing, implementing, or evaluating SBOM.
2 citations
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.01 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{susana2025,
title = {{A Scale for Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Studies Based on Observational Methodology}},
author = {Susana Sanduvete‐Chaves et al.},
journal = {Psicothema},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.01},
} TY - JOUR
TI - A Scale for Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Studies Based on Observational Methodology
AU - al., Susana Sanduvete‐Chaves et
JO - Psicothema
PY - 2025
ER - Susana Sanduvete‐Chaves et al. (2025). A Scale for Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Studies Based on Observational Methodology. *Psicothema*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.01 Susana Sanduvete‐Chaves et al.. "A Scale for Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Studies Based on Observational Methodology." *Psicothema* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.01. A Scale for Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Studies Based on Observational Methodology
Susana Sanduvete‐Chaves et al. · Psicothema · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.01 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10 M · momentum 0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.